I joined a panel discussion earlier this week!
The note-taker notes that I apparently said:
- He had a specific goal in mind: publication after the grant (note that the grant does not pay for publication costs themselves)
- His proposal for this year is clearly defined and narrow in scope
- It is important to state how this project benefits Webster and increases our institution’s profile
- Emphasized the need for a “finished product that is somehow distributable.”
I’m glad I made sense!
And I’m working on a dandy idea for a grant for this next academic year . . . !
(By the way, the photo is three years old, but it shows me doing something noteworthy, so I used it.)